Main Menu

MELAYE: court to revoke Bail

The Federal Government, on Wednesday, prayed a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), sitting at Maitama, to revoke the bail it granted to Sen. Dino Melaye.

Melaye, a senator representing Kogi West Senatorial District in the National Assembly, was on March 1, arranged before the court over allegation that information he gave to the Nigerian Police Force about an assassination attempt on his life on 15 April 2017, was false.

According a charge marked CR/106/18, Melaye was alleged to have falsely incriminated the Chief of Staff to Governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State, Mr. Edward Onoja David, in the said assassination attempt.

The charge dated January 31, 2018, revealed that the police had in the course of investigation,discovered that Melaye was attempting to frame-up some persons with his claim.

The senator was alleged to have told Abubakar, a son of a former governor of Kogi State in a telephone conversation how he framed Edward Onoja David in the assassination attempt.

‎When the matter came up yesterday, Sen. Melaye was absent in court.

His absence promoted the application by the prosecution counsel, ‎Mr. Labaran Shuaibu, applied for the revocation of Melaye’s bail.

‎In the alternative, the prosecution said the court should summon the person that stood surety for him to appear and show cause why he should not be committed to prison for the absence of the defendant.

“My lord the defendant was granted bail by this court and the case was adjourned till today for hearing, but he is not present in court.

“The fact is that he was granted bail and he perfected the conditions and was released, whatever he may have done afterwards is not the business of this court.

“In the circumstance my lord, we shall be applying for this court to order the surety to the defendant to come and show cause. Otherwise, we shall be compelled to ask that the bail be revoked”, Shuaibu added.

He told the court that FG has lined up four witnesses that will testify against Melaye.

However, the defence counsel, Mr. Ricky Tarfa, SAN, accused FG of concealing the true facts and circumstances of the case to the court.

“My lord I expected the prosecution to be more forthright by laying the facts bare before this court.

“After the last proceeding, the defendant has been charged before different courts. One in Abuja granted him bail, but immediately he was released, he was taken on a stretcher to Lokoja the following day and charged before a Magistrate Court.

“That court refused him bail. However, an application was made before a High Court in Lokoja which took into consideration the facts of the case and ordered that the defendant should be taken into Police custody for proper medical care pending the determination of his bail application.

“His bail application before that court was adjourned till today for ruling”, Tarfa submitted.

The senior lawyer submitted that the application by the prosecution counsel amounted to persecution.

He told the courti that such application could only be made when there is no explanation as to whereabouts of the defendant.

Tarfa said he was ready to produce the high court order that remanded Melaye in police custody.

After she had listened to both parties, trial Justice Olasumbo Goodluck agreed with the prosecution that accepting the narration from Melaye’s counsel would amount to receiving evidence from the bar.

She said the defence lawyer ought to know the proper thing to do if his client was indisposed to attend his trial.

“Even the explanation itself should be properly brought before this court because you don’t know how far this case can go. It is either you bring the said court papers or it will be tidier for the surety to come and show cause as he guaranteed the physical attendance of the defendant in court for his trial”.

Stressing that the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, ACJA, 2015, made provisions on how criminal trials should be conducted in the absence of a defendant, Justice Goodluck subsequently adjourned the case till Thursday.

“The defence counsel is to take appropriate steps to explain the absence of the defendant”, the court held.

It will be recalled that the court had shortly after Melaye pleaded not guilty to the charge, granted him bail to the tune of N100, 000, even as he was ordered to produce a surety that must be a civil servant not below grade level 14.

The court held that the surety must be in the Federal Civil Service and must prove that he is resident within the Federal Capital Territory.

In count one of the charge, Melaye was accused of deliberately giving false information to the police






Comments are Closed